FANDOM


  • OK, so Opdagon posted this thing. Does it count as pornography?

      Loading editor
    • I'm not entirely sure. The presence of the "cannon-like structure" coming out of its crotch at least pushes it towards Sporn.

        Loading editor
    • And the fact that the second creature is intended to be a living female reproductory system?

        Loading editor
    • If it were depicting the externally-visible parts of a reproductive system, that would count.

        Loading editor
    • Oh, OK. Thanks.

        Loading editor
    • The "cannon-like structure" follows on from "the other pair being testes" (2 of the legs) in the same sentence, so that seems to be the implication. And yet the pair of legs look like legs and the cannon isn't explicitly written to be what seems to be implied.

      I'd say it is still only Sporn if you want to read it as such. But it takes some decompression to do that, and probably not a glance.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.