FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hi Ghelæ

    I'm asking some of the other wiki admins this same thing, but I'm curious if this community has ever considered enabling the discussions feature. Having a modern and easy area for users to communicate that is integrated into the wiki can increase activity and adds another reason to keep users coming back. Adding this feature basically upgrades the wiki from just an encyclopedia, into a comprehensive fan destination and a place for users to hang out, rather than just visiting the wiki quickly for some information, and then leaving. It could help invite fresh energy, new ideas and conversations, and help sustain the community.

    Discussions will be a part of wikis on the "United Community Platform" that Fandom is in the process of rolling out, so it might be useful to have this wiki's users familiar with the system, before we all move into the new platform.

    If you'd like, I could enable this feature for the wiki and it could possibly encourage new editors to join (or old ones to return). Let me know. You can find more information about it at these links:


    - Sitb @fandom (Message wall / Talk page) 09:03, March 13, 2020 (UTC)

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Ghelæ,

    I thought I would reach out to you, since you are one of the most recently-active administrators here.

    I am this wiki's new Wiki Manager. I am here on behalf of Fandom to support your wiki's community, help it grow and thrive and act as a liaison between you, and full-time staff. If you, or any other users of this wiki ever have an issue or question related to editing, templates, wiki design, or Fandom policies etc. please feel free to contact me on my message wall, and I will assist in any way I can. I have already made a forum post to introduce myself to the wiki community, and have also joined the wiki's Discord server, so I can be even more accessible to users.
    - Sitb @fandom (Message wall / Talk page) 00:53, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • In the deletion log i never did agree to the page being deleted, it was to a mess up of the deletion canidate

      Loading editor
  • I fit the criteria for all of the requirements to receive the role. Thank you.

      Loading editor
  • Can you send me the link to OluapPlayers profile page

      Loading editor
  • Basically, there are many users that simply mention and briefly describe their creatures in the pages of the planets they live in, without making them their own pages; while others use the fiction empire infobox instead of the creature infobox. I was wondering if there was a way of classifying those creatures without affecting the aestethic of the page (just in case the owners of the pages don't like a creature infobox being randomly placed in them).

      Loading editor
  • OK, so Opdagon posted this thing. Does it count as pornography?

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • Oh, OK. Thanks.

        Loading editor
    • The "cannon-like structure" follows on from "the other pair being testes" (2 of the legs) in the same sentence, so that seems to be the implication. And yet the pair of legs look like legs and the cannon isn't explicitly written to be what seems to be implied.

      I'd say it is still only Sporn if you want to read it as such. But it takes some decompression to do that, and probably not a glance.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Ghelæ, I'm currently having a debate with Opdagon (again) about the family Nanofuria and its members, but we can't get to an agreement. If you don't have something more important to do, could you please help us settle this down? Thank you in advance.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Why is reclassifying animals based on a couple parts only OK when my creatures alone are affected?

      Loading editor
    • View all 49 replies
    • Dinoman972 wrote:

      Opdagon wrote: So, how is the type of foot fiction-wise and not morphology?

      The description said "hard-skinned", not "insect-footed".

      They have hard skin on their foot, unlike all other furians

        Loading editor
    • You could have specified.

      Also, "limbed furiaformes" is too general, as many of them have limbs while looking very different.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • The "A FANDOM user" with the I.P. of 12.18.189.83 has created a spam page and other spam material. Do me a favor and SCROMBULATE him.

      Loading editor
    • Done! Normally I'd tell you to add the {{delete}} template to a page when you want it to be deleted, but you seem to have figured out to add the category which has the same effect.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.