Thread:Dinoman972/@comment-32744161-20180528145333/@comment-24941009-20180603101846

Ghelæ wrote: This discussion has run to 155 messages in three threads, two on this message wall and one on mine, and seems to be afflicted with some points being misinterpreted, and others being discussed over and over again. It's difficult to see the big picture, let alone all of the little details, when everything you've said is so spread out.

Here's an idea: the two of you could type up your proposals for the taxonomic structure of these orders. What families will they have, how will they be defined, which species will they have in them, and what is your reasoning for each of these things? Put all of your points in one place where they can be easily referred to.

OK, let's do that. Sorry for ignoring it before, I didn't see the message.

First of all, I think Monera should be left just as it is currently. However, I'd like to note that, since there are already taxons for carnivorous and omnivorous cells, taxons Oozlebachridae and Ciliophora should be made only for herbivorous cells, which already represent the majority of both taxa. Also, Myxozoa should be deleted, as all of its members have already been reclassified. As for the Nanofuria thing, I think the Pathola should go in Carnitoria, due to having a main carnivorous mouth and two secondary proboscides, similarly to the carnitorian Sloop. Due to having a proboscis as it's main mouth, the Speedsucker should go in Proboscitoria, being in a different genus as such.

As for Furiaformes as a whole, Nanofuria should be removed due to being empty after the reclassication of its members I mentioned before. Enhaima has already been moved and all creatures that are drastically different have been separated by genus, so I think it's OK for now. Kilbit Furian's genus might need revision for its different mouth, though.