Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-1309126-20160214210140/@comment-4991685-20160214231748

I think it should be noted that the primary issue at hand here shouldn't be Oluap's conduct; All and all he is a reliable admin and I have no complaints, especially as new details emerge. The last thing I or anybody else wants is some horrid witch-hunt against him.

What should be the main issue at hand is the role of an admin as either ruler or moderator, and like I've stated before administrators should not so much as rule a wiki as is suggested, as they should continue to moderate it, and trust that users behave. It seems to be working for the most part, and when isolated cases like this happen, they should be dealt with appropriately but I regret that they have to be percieved as examples of some sort of invisible trend, or become such far-reaching debates.