Thread:Opdagon/@comment-1073312-20180623000311

Like I have mentioned in the past, it is best practice to take disagreements you have with other contributors to the talk pages instead of page itself. You have at least continued the debate on various threads which commendable, but this is what you should be doing prior to changing the page.

Here's some recent examples:


 * 1 - Here you undid Disgustedorite's realistic example of a type species in Spinosauridae. It is true that your creature was replaced but it was done with a strong justification, that being the Humpry creature is what we are aiming for, with type species.  This forced Disgustedorite to undo your edit once more.
 * 2 - You repeat the same mistake.
 * 3 - You removed a wastebasket taxon without justification.
 * 4 - You classified a page without getting an active user's permission.

I firmly believe that in your mind, you are contributing to the project. You keep repeating these mistakes, which leads me to conclude that you are unfamiliar with the ideas being advanced by other contributors. This at least includes:
 * The purpose of the wastebasket template.
 * The idea behind type species.
 * The policy that has recently been emphasised that permission should be granted from active users to reclassify their taxons.
 * My warning not to start edit conflicts, this has also been recently emphasised.

I recommend that you talk to users who's edits you are unsatisfied with *before* undoing their edits. You should also familiarise yourself with current developments, by asking people what justified their edits if you don't understand their rationale, or if you think they are unjustified (they may be right, or you may be right). You must also keep up to date with the taxonomy guidelines.

I don't want to get at you, but the way you are editing isn't very efficient or constructive at the movement. It would be better for you and everyone-else involved if you engaged more with other members of the community. 