Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-32744161-20180311210620/@comment-32744161-20180313074234

Ghelæ wrote: Hmm. Firstly, I wouldn't say that being made of organic matter is better grounds for including Pulpia in Cytota than resembling an artificial object is for including it in Artificia.

As for Hegovixowia, all of that can be deleted: its pages are utterly devoid of content and, because their creator has been absent for nearly nine years, they'll probably never be added to. That means we won't have to worry about its place in the taxonomy at all.

That leaves the general idea of bringing Floridata, Cnidaria and Monera into a single taxon. That could be reasonable, but the latter two taxa seem to be much like the rest of Amorphia (so why separate them out from it?) while Floridata does not predominantly resemble either of them and actually seems to be more dominated by vertebrate-like forms. So it sounds to me like this would be even more of a wastebasket taxon than Cryptia. Monera is made of cells, some which are prokaryotes, and therefore shouldn't be classified among actual animals. Cnidarians appear to only be non-cryptians, as real animals resemble them (water isn't flesh). I don't see how a taxon for creatures with traits not of real animals is less of a wastebasket than one for organic non-animals.