Thread:The Clanden/@comment-1370845-20140816003206/@comment-1370845-20140816035738

We've agreed there is a commubication issue. This is a good thing. It's true communication is an issue, but that's what this is supposed to solve, eh?

Anyway. I am not fighting against your freedom. The issue is you appeared - and I must make that clear, appeared - to be fighting against the freedom of others by involving a faction formed with the express purpose of not being involved. It has been noted that doing so was an in-universe reason to involve no one. It did not come across as such. I want to force no one to conform to fiction rules. I want to force people to conform to rules of assuming good faith and banning of any type of hostility. I will explain in my next response.

Yes, I fully agree the side thay feels threatened need to express that they feel threatened. But the side feeling so is also the side that is the victim. There is more responsibility for the unintentional oppressor than there is for the victim in this scenario. And that is why my side was against that of the unintentional bullies before it was against the unintentionally bullied.

You are no ringleader. But the problem is you are perceived as such. And maybe this is not your fault, but when the complaints are "AB and his gang" instead of "that gang", then yes, you are seen as responsible. But this may well be their fault for not really speaking up in favour of themselves. People have complained, and done so quietly, but I have taken no action out of respect.

I don't want to make this too offtopic, but while I do see why it would appear to you the new user way of thinking needs representing, the contributions you have listed to me are not the ones that the admin staff needs. We don't need one that can contribute to the fiction universe, we need one that can contribute to the wiki for what it is. And, much as I like Tybusen and Monet, their contributions don't show that. They are experienced in areas that do not need experience.