Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-4991685-20170904232604/@comment-1370845-20170905001800

You know, if your goal was to get the community to discuss or consider making the "requirement" more lenient (the requirement was just a stop-gap, and can change later), perhaps writing a gigantic wall of text and making them read through it first wasn't the best way to go about that role. Personally, I believe the "250 edits" criteria should be used as a general guideline rather than a strict ruleset and that if it becomes clear that a user is likely to stay in spite of not having reached 250 edits (perhaps through consistent editing as suggested here), then they can be given the Wiki Contributor role. I trust the community to use common sense here.

Also, no, the fact that the data is already catelogued does not mean mainspacers "won't have that much to talk about". There's plenty to do with the mainspace, which is utter crap. The reason a mainspace discord would be mostly dead is that no one can be bothered to work on articles for an almost decade old game that was generally accepted to be disappointing outside of the editor tools. That, and splitting off to a new Discord from us is a ridiculous idea; we are better off directing "casual" non-wiki editors to a Discord channel set up by the subreddit or Sporums or another community (and perhaps becoming affiliated with it and linking people to it).