Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-25175729-20180615181837/@comment-25175729-20180623152548

Opdagon wrote: Disgustedorite wrote: It cannot have speculative traits unless they are either a common mistake on the wiki (i.e. two-fingered hands on dromaeosaurs) or are commonly featured in palaeoart (i.e. whiskers on otherwise scaly dinosaurs)--in the case of common mistakes, there must already be a type species that does not make this mistake! Why is stegosauridae exempt from this rule? It isn't. You have yet to prove that the type species listed has impossible or improbable traits, and that this chart of stegosaur back plates is inaccurate.