Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-4242472-20140816221856/@comment-1309126-20140816225142

I'll probably say what shouldn't be said.

Revamping the admins on the wiki comes with the ever-present underlying risk of promoting potentially tyrannical users as a result. Like what's been said here; we can't nominate admins on the basis that we like the user. Whether we like the user or not has no effect on what the user could do to the wiki even if the user doesn't seem like they would presently. I'll also stand by my point on what I said on the other forum; class divisions on the wiki do exist and there's nothing we can do to fix that. Users can take advantage of that and the reason why the current admins and bureaucrats are where they are is because they will not take advantage of that.

I honestly think this whole palaver is just paranoia that has gotten out of hand. If it isn't broken, don't fix it.