Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-32744161-20180311210620/@comment-47205-20180313171806

I have reverted your changes because you made them before the discussion came to a conclusion. To respond to your comments:
 * All "cells" made in-game are clearly animal-like in appearance, possessing parts such as eyes that resemble
 * The definition of Cryptia is poor. Our taxonomy is supposed to be morphological, so the definition should be based on what they resemble and not some purely in-fiction properties. Thus, cnidarians being watery should not be sufficient to classify them within a taxon for un-animal-like creatures. I have fixed this issue.
 * For the same reason, a taxon for creatures with traits of artificial objects is better - it's based on morphology - than a taxon for creatures with variously animal-like, artificial-like and plant-like traits united purely under the grounds that they're supposed to be made of biological materials.