Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-32744161-20180622132541/@comment-25175729-20180622220827

Opdagon wrote: Disgustedorite wrote: I have literally never heard anyone other than you argue that spinosaurs may have low necks. You should have had more arguments, because low neck is the view with the majority of images on the wikipedia page That's it. Let me tell you every single thing wrong with it.
 * It does not even have a real hump that's accurate to how humps are depicted in reconstructions that follow the theory (which always show the hump as thinner than the body or at least tapering)
 * Its tail is too short
 * The head is still inaccurately low even compared to the images on Wikipedia which still clearly have the neck at an upwards angle from the body
 * Its neck shows no signs of the S curve that all theropods have
 * It has too many toes
 * It has no claws on its toes
 * The tail is held too low causing it to appear broken
 * You gave its back a bell curve which literally nobody has ever thought any theropod has
 * The heel is too high
 * The legs are too zig-zagged
 * You used noodle limbs instead of ones that match the known musculature of theropods
 * The feet and hands are still too big
 * You put its eyes--which are waaaaaaaaay too big--on its neck
 * You splayed its legs out like a lizard--no dinosaur that has ever existed has its legs spread out because they will literally pop right out of their sockets! You can test this with any whole chicken you buy at the store!
 * You didn't even give it nostrils!

Shall I go on?