Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-32744161-20181016092550/@comment-32744161-20181016134319

Disgustedorite wrote: Your taxa are often very very poorly defined and very vague wastebaskets. A bad taxonomist rarely makes good taxa. Then why are they remade, but without my name, and in one case named after a new creature? Disgustedorite wrote: As for post 10, it's barely worth it. You made such a huge deal about how grossly inaccurate my stuff supposedly was for not showing a speculative trait that there was no evidence for and yet you still insisted on sending in confusingly bad creatures as type species, often without permission or approval. Disgustedorite wrote: And nobody has been moving your creatures around based on limb count since long before your first warning! I was removed from the project for ancient stuff.
 * 1) Read the whole post.
 * 2) Wikipedia won't show all life art of a dinosaur with a "speculative trait that there was no evidence for".