Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-4242472-20140816221856/@comment-1073312-20140817002817

Right, to meet my criticisms at least, I'd like to know how this admin roster/cycle solution works any better than what we have presently.
 * How does it make future projects any more inclusive (may I remind people we should be focusing on that like I said at the beginning)?
 * How does it stop adminship being viewed as a token?
 * How would this idea work better than Cyrannian's idea that "sort of council on separate IRC channels to deal with particular matters in a way that doesn't differentiate between admins and non-admins. These council decisions would be made in accordance with the will of the majority, not the will of the admins."

I am listening to proponents and while yes, I am an opponent, we need to deconstruct proposals rationally. You can't expect things to change without that. To really convince everyone the wiki needs to change its admin structure, the new theory has to meet these problems and do it better.

And to meet your points:
 * We agree the best mode of getting new admins after-all, is the old way of self-nomination.
 * The fact that, people editing outside the namespace is a brilliant at advertising one's passion for editing. Also what can be done outside the namespace is huge.
 * Are we neglecting our duty?