Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-1309126-20160214210140/@comment-1309126-20160214232407

Lucario of the Gods wrote:

Then do not do what Vincent did and intentionally incite and provoke an aggressive response, that is simple enough.

Also, I worded my thoughts the way I did because I believe that I should not feel like I should sugar-coat what I feel would be better for the wiki and what the admins should do to move towards it, whether the rest of the community likes what I say or not. Authority is authority and there should be less of a blurred line between admin and user as Technobliterator makes there out to be, because that line is clear and definite.

I do not care if you feel if I was speaking out of turn or if I sounded like I supported a tyrannical regime over the wiki or not; I do not advocate for Vincent to be punished because the business was done outside of the wiki and the IRC by technicality and later apparently resolved, but I do advocate against discriminating against Oluap for the manner in which he responded in that incident and not against Vincent for ultimately provoking it and furthering it when he could have prevented it entirely. I also advocate for users to not question administrators performing their roles and duties as expected because that is why the admins are admins and the users are not admins.

Users have free rein to question Administrators within reason - users have a right to understand why an admin does things the way they do, because whilst admins do have a duty to maintain peace, they don't operate on a higher dimension. Discrimination aside; no user should really respond in an aggressive manner. I wouldn't be aggressive to you, nor would I be aggressive to Oluap, and nor would I want that in turn.