Thread:Dinoman972/@comment-35440796-20180620190446/@comment-35440796-20180620204416

Dinoman972 wrote: There is also a difference between defining a creature and merely claiming its a mammal. The only mammalian trait you defined is the mammary glands, which is significant but not enough, as many synapsids and even some birds (the Rambo, for example) have them as well. The page doesn't say anything about fur or other mammalian parts (eg.: hooves).

And I'm not saying the creation is wrong, I'm just saying it doesn't match the description of a pure mammal. They're not the same thing either. no, i'll say it again, morphology =/= taxonomy. no one who knows anything about how taxonomy actually works classifies creatures entirely by stereotypical physical features.

regardless, don't pretentiously classify someone else's fiction by your standards, i can see you've annoyed other people with this not just me.