Vehicle:Monitor/Conclusions Regarding Monitor Teleonomy

Conclusions Regarding Monitor Teleonomy
DIVISION: Special Intelligence

METHODS: Data retrieved from Archway, Concord, Sterling, and Labolas Monitors and their actions through PSYINT and SIGINT:ESO techniques was parsed using Ottmev's criterion analysis, with emphasis on noesis and intentionality. Conclusions were correlated with previous teleonomic analysis of Motive behaviors and controls.

SUMMARY: Monitors are non-synthetic, non-biotic intelligent systems. Monitors exist as autarkic concepts (emanated from a central conceptual realm) embedded in a material substrate allowing it to interact with the 3D realspace brane as a physical entity. Monitors possess a subtle impositional influence on reality that may increase in potency as the number of Monitors rises.

TEXT: Each Monitor is a pataphor emergent from an underlying conceptual realm. We will refer to this conceptual realm as Origin. We posit that Origin is synonymous with the Motive concept of Progress.

Monitors cannot exist in this brane without a substrate. This substrate must itself be an expression of Origin, constructed specifically to provide a Monitor with inhabitance. Damaging this substrate does not damage the Monitor; rather, damage to the substrate damages the Monitor's ability to inhabit it. This represents a contest of concepts: an argument. Rendering the Monitor's expression non-viable represents a refutation of the Monitor, banishing it to Origin.

Conversely, it may be possible that any victories a Monitor achieves will render that individual Monitor more difficult to banish.

In addition, we posit that, as the number of extant Monitors within this brane increases, the more difficult those Monitors will be to refute. Concurrently, as the number of other expressions of Origin within this brane increases (inclusive of both Monitors and Terminals), the level of semiotic leverage the Monitors possess also increases until they become able to effect direct ontomorphic influence on reality.

This threshold may have already been reached: see IMPOSE WILL. Assuming this case is true, consequently, as the number of extant Monitors within this brane increases, we posit that the scale and severity of Monitor ontomorphic capability will increase proportionally. This may ultimately represent an existential threat to baseline reality.

The history of the relationship between Origin, Monitors, and Motive remains uncertain.