Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-1370845-20150505005336/@comment-1370845-20150505111310

I do not see how excluding unnecessary information is "selling readers short". You are correct that we can go more into detail here, but I will reiterate for the umpteenth time that I would like someone to do so while staying on topic before I will agree to doing it. This is the purpose of option two.

Also, there is nothing to oppose here; either we go with an option or we go wih none. If you mean that you oppose any change, then you are in favour of option 3 - a lack of change other than the much needed cleanup of the articles. I am still yet to be convinced that this is the best option as I still do not see it as helpful to readers and do not see how we can be more helpful to them than Wikipedia can.