Thread:Opdagon/@comment-1073312-20181004204914

Since your return to SporeWiki, the community has decided some of your editing conduct is unconstructive and that some changes have derailed certain member's contributions. You have not broken any rules and you have avoided edit warring, so you do not risk a wiki-block. But these are serious problems presented by the community, and I am warning that you will be removed from the Taxonomy Project if you don't improve ASAP.

Activity the community deemed unconstructive since your return:
 * 1) Making changes to taxa without concluding a discussion with an agreement.
 * 2) Moving taxa under construction by another user.
 * 3) Cluttering taxon pages by adding clades when there are not enough taxa inside to justify it.
 * 4) Reverting edits made to taxons in the duration of your block.

These are not constructive edits, because they slow the resolution of the disagreement and cause more edits to fix. I can see why certain members feel like their ability to contribute is being derailed when their edits are being undone, or changed before they are able to complete. I hope you can understand that all of this looks needlessly combative, which is discouraged on the taxonomy project rules. I don't want you to be removed from the taxonomy project, so I'm going to suggest the following improvements to avoid conflicts of interest in the future:

You should seek conflict resolution. If you find your edits (or someone-else's) are in disagreement, stop everything you are doing and try resolve the dispute first. I'm not here to say who is right or wrong, but you should reach an agreement with the other user before returning to the taxonomy project. This applies especially to (1) and (4), but also the rest. As for (2), if you see someone making a taxon, don't just repurpose it without talking to the creator first, and especially if the page lacks a construction template. This means the user has yet to finish it. As for (3), these edits seem pointless to me, but if you think these changes are justified, debate the community about it first.

Thanks for your time. 