Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-32744161-20181016092550/@comment-24941009-20181016145645


 * Remaking a taxon is quite similar to deleting it and making a new one. And when a taxon is renamed, the authority changes too since someone else has proposed it. Also, can you explain what case are you talking about?
 * As Dorite said, post 10 isn't that worth it, partially because you skipped several parts of the post you replied to (and will probably do so with this one as well). Just because things were being done wrong some years ago doesn't mean we must still make them wrong; Spore creature quality isn't fully dependent of the game itself, but the creator also plays a role (just look at the creatures of more experienced creators like Xho and Shiznasty); even if your creatures were "perfect" (which they don't need to be, but also shouldn't have Shagraptor levels of innacuracy), you kept adding them without permission and that's why they were removed again and again; and classifying creature judging by the amount of one of their bodyparts and nothing more will result in wastebaskets.
 * So? I don't see what point you're trying to make there. Of course Wikipedia won't show all art of an extinct creature.
 * AND modern stuff. Remember the Parasiticidae incident? And the Bugfish, which you likely posted just to make a point about "Protostomochordata" despite the guidelines clearly stating that it cannot be done?