Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-32744161-20180513194903

First of all, I am saying that the ingame morphology is what should be used, as all other things are statements by the author, so another line between morphology and not morphology would be arbitrary Chordata and Arthropoda are only based on ingame morphology when taken as the sum of their parts. A better system would be mouth morphology. Chordate=Vertical jaws, Arthropod=Horizontal jaws, and Lophotrocozoa=Round jaws. Similar creatures will still be grouped together (So, a round jawed fish would still be in pisces). Amphibia would be for chordates with an actual larval form discussed or displayed on the page. Chordates with at least 2 out of a beak, a feather part, and a wing part will be aves. Reptilia would be for nonavian chordates with a scaly texture. Mammalia would include animals with hair parts, or animals with more mammalian than amphibian parts. Pisces would contain chordates without a larval stage, but with more amphibian or fish parts (Including fins). Insects would be winged arthropods, crustaceans wingless, armoured ones, Lobopodia would lose Vetucoilia to hemiinsecta, and become a child of crustacea. Arachnida would be a dumping ground for the leftover arthropods. Lophotrocozoa is OK. 