Talk:Darkspore

Dont delete the page. I think that a spore where you can go inter-galactic would be cool.

ALERT
YESTERDAY, for a brief period of 1-2 hours, a darkspore website existed. It showed magnificent pictures of spore with a much darker theme, and some information about it. Right now, in the general discussion section of the sporum, somebody created a thread with the pictures, and he translated into Czech for his Czech friends. Anyway, it looks rather interesting.

Please, make new sections down the bottom. Anyway: Proof or it didn't happen! Give me some links here! 07:30, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, found links myself: here! Whether these are real or not, I don't know.

Deletion
I dought a new game for these reasons: They haven't given patches 1.05 and 1.5.000001 for macintosh (mac) users! (I have a mac!) they haven't given patch 1.06 for non-American users! They have only done one expansion! They have only done one parts (not including bot and exoskeleton) pack! They have only done seven patches!!

And for those reasons, I belive that Dark spore is only: 1. A lie (like the cake creator is likly a trick)! 2. A patch 3. A expansion pack! 4. A parts pack! 5. A trick!

Yeah and to finish my point, put my points up onto the page. Also, whoever was at the top, put your signiture! Four tides (this: ~ ) if you don't know how to do it. 75.12.158.123 12:49, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Why delete it? It just says the currently known info (EA trademarked it) and it lists some rumours that people have said. It doesn't say any rumour/idea is true.  Tyranno Fan  - 15:20, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Some user might have created it to get us all excited. If you notice, the trademark thing is just a black and white version of the original Spore trademark. You can easily get a picture like that by editing on a computer. I think it's fake and it wouldn't be called Dark Spore. Lucario of the Gods (talk 15:23, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

EA TRADEMARKED the name. How can it be fake?  Tyranno Fan  - 15:26, May 28, 2010 (UTC) You know what, let's just wait to see if it's true, in the meanwhile, delete this page.  Tyranno Fan  - 15:27, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

How do we know EA trademarked it? Lucario of the Gods (talk 15:30, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Google it before saying that-- 15:32, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

It's not fake. Trademarked, so EA HAS to do something with the trademarked name, or else it would've been pointless.

There is PROOF now put that on the page-- 15:35, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

How did you find it Techno, i searched for it on Google, but all that showed up was some Digimon things. 15:42, May 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I put up the deletion template because it reeks of trolling, since it's not that hard to fake. As said above, many people with a computer could make the image.  Furthermore, wiki's really shouldn't have articles making this sort of claim without proof.  However, that link and the 3 trademarks it links to look legitimate, I'll add it to the page and remove the template.   16:40, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I googled "Dark Spore" before putting up the deletion flag and found nothing. 16:49, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

"(No one knows) here are the speculations:" Are you saying it's saying all of the 'Speculations' are supposed to be put in to your face and said are supposed to be true even though they are 'SPECULATIONS'? 16:45, May 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * No, there are different levels of speculation. Things that are easily verifiable within the Spore game don't need outside sources, speculation as to things like where the Grox came from end up on blogs and that sort of thing due to being unverifiable (it has no place on the main namespace), and this sort of thing, rumors about sequels, need proof, or else we are simply getting people's hopes up for no reason.  I never deleted this page saying that it was spam, I only put up a warning saying that without proof that would be the outcome.  In a sense, it's responsible journalism, wanting to not report things (claiming that a trademark has been claimed is rather big, too) without knowing that they are true.  16:49, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Well if it really is a more in-depth and complex version of Spore i'll certainly be interested, but I doubt it, it's probably a dev code for a new expansion pack. Ҵїҫэӌ Ҭӈә Ѕҥїʐʐɻє 17:26, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Code name
Could it be a code name like Blue Harvest for Star Wars? 18:20, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

Image Needed
Does anybody have a picture of this trademarked picture? The last time I checked the page there wasn't one. Chihuahua0 16:17, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

EA hasn't released any previews yet. Remember to sign your posts using the four tidles (~ ~ ~ ~) 16:28, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Added the Logo
I added the 'official' DarkSpore logo released by Maxis. 08:15, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks fake. Proof? &mdash; Foto ☆ shop  15:15, July 4, 2010 (UTC)