Thread:Disgustedorite/@comment-32744161-20181001190518/@comment-24941009-20181003201623

Opdagon wrote: Dinoman972 wrote: I'm pretty sure that's not Lobopodia's definition. It was actually "superficially piscine arthropods with odd traits" Nope, that was your definition which doesn't match any of the creatures in the real-life taxon. The closest are dinocaridids, which might not be actual lobopods and have no piscine traits besides those weird swimming lobes.