Thread:AuraMasterNeal/@comment-4991685-20150314034911

...I noticed that you never actually addressed any of my points in your "rebuttal" to me a few days ago. You simply pulled reductio ad absurdum on me by rhetorically asking me if the makers of Candy Crush needed to copyright the term of "Candy" (the answer, by the way, is no; You can't copyright or trademark words too broad. Obviously, they'd copyright the term "Candy Crush"). If you can seriously convince me that copyright is unnecessary or destructive without the use of fallacies, then I'll concede.

I post here, as posting on the other board this originated from would take it off-topic. 