Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-32744161-20181112171811/@comment-25175729-20181112194000

Opdagon wrote: Disgustedorite wrote: Also, every single one of those classifications is incorrect How? Where would they go?
 * Tetrapterus horridus does not resemble either of the families you listed. At a glance alone, it looks like it belongs in Nyctosauridae.
 * Pectinicetus pteris is a mollusk with a shell and no visible fins--in what universe does something like that belong in the same family as the great white shark? It looks like it should be in Juliidae or Cypraeidae, though I can't be sure without more angles on its shell.
 * Camurmanus is a wastebasket and should not be used. Odongnathus dracum looks nothing like anything in Actiniidae and would instead either be classified as a flytrap or a new family.
 * Baslikia is a wastebasket and should not be used; further, Xenocycle gorgon does not match the description. It would likely get its own family.
 * Jerigmucidae's criteria require horns. Further, they cannot have lips. All of your weird 2-headed archosaurs would need new families. The pisciforme has visible gills and as such would be classified as a shark.
 * Snaiadichthys biceph does not even remotely resemble any real-world Phylliroids. It would get its own family or be classified as some sort of fish, perhaps a catfish.
 * Bufocephalus cetus looks absolutely nothing like a perch of any kind regardless of order or family. If I were to classify it as a fish at all I think it would be best classified among rays.
 * Vampiropterus is clearly not a Eleutherodontid because those things have mammal traits. Like lips. They physically could not evolve beaks. Instead, that would be best placed in a new neornithischian family, related to ornithopods.