Thread:Dinoman972/@comment-25175729-20180614202045/@comment-25175729-20180615112333

Dinoman972 wrote: Disgustedorite wrote: Further, the family you moved it to was vandalized by opdagon and originally had a completely different definition. Pterosauria is valid. Oh, I didn't know that. Sorry.

But let's do what Ghelae said. Pterosaurs technically share avian and reptilian traits, like dinosaurs, so they fit in the class. Even if this would mean removing the two Pterosaur orders (Ramphorhynchoidea and Pterodactyloidea), having all families sharing an order, I don't consider it a problem, as the same thing works for Theropoda. Ghelae is the one who allowed me to make pterosauria in the first place. Pterosaurs are also hundreds of times more morphologically different from dinosaurs than birds are, so it would be like putting reptiles under mammals.